The topic of the authority of a criminal judgment is one of the most complex subjects in procedural law. It directly intersects with judicial work, allowing for numerous judicial applications. This is a crucial and sensitive topic, as a criminal judgment can serve as conclusive evidence for either proof or refutation, depending on the circumstances. It also acts as a constraint, limiting the civil judiciary's freedom to examine a matter that has already been decided by the criminal judiciary. This research aims to clarify these situations.

Although the title suggests a broad "comparative study," this research specifically limits its comparison to only two legal systems: Jordanian law and Egyptian law.

This study is based on two scientific research methodologies:

• The Deductive Method: This approach involves analyzing the legal texts concerning the authority of criminal judgments before civil courts, while also examining the stance of jurisprudence and the judiciary on these texts.
• The Comparative Method: Through this method, legal texts are juxtaposed to determine the most effective solutions regarding the authority of criminal judgments in Jordanian and Egyptian civil law.

• ISBN: 9789957167288
• Weight: 0.650 kg
• Dimensions: 17×24 cm
• Paper: White
• Pages: 256
• Year of Publication: 2012
• Binding: Hardcover