If we define structuralism as a theory as much as it is a method and more, we deviate from the interpretation of Claude Lévi-Strauss himself, from which most debates originated. After Noam Chomsky proved that structuralism in the field of linguistics is a specific, and flawed, theory, not a scientific method, it is worth asking whether we are also, in the field of anthropology, facing a flawed or disastrous theory. This is the only question that we want, at the level that the research has reached, to pose to the structuralist, his critic, and his reader.

• Author: Dan Sperber
• Publishing House: Dar Al-Tanweer for Printing, Publishing and Distribution
• Year of publication: 2006
• Number of Pages: 112