In 'Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion,' Paul Bloom challenges the widely held belief that empathy is inherently good. He meticulously argues that while well-intentioned, empathy can be a dangerous and biased guide for moral decision-making. Bloom contends that our natural inclination to feel what others feel often narrows our focus, leading to irrational choices and potentially harmful outcomes in areas ranging from charitable giving to public policy. Instead, he advocates for 'rational compassion,' a more thoughtful and reasoned approach to morality that leverages intellect and a broader perspective to promote genuine welfare. This provocative book encourages readers to re-evaluate their understanding of kindness and ethics, urging a shift from impulsive emotional responses to deliberate, evidence-based actions for the greater good.